Health Board
 

The Humanist, May-June 1999 - "The AAP "Circumcision Policy Statement" continues, in effect, to endorse, whenever parents so choose, a concept that our common law condemns. This becomes particularly onerous when the beneficiary of this "forcible extraction" is an unknown future person where the incidence of alleged future diseases has been acknowledged by the AAP in the same statement to be insufficient to justify the application of routine circumcision."

Search Health Board More search options

Child Health: Circumcision: Articles: Circumcision, Human Rights, and Ethical Medical Practice  Previous Next
 

Circumcision, Human Rights, and Ethical Medical Practice


The Humanist, May-June 1999 - "The AAP "Circumcision Policy Statement" continues, in effect, to endorse, whenever parents so choose, a concept that our common law condemns. This becomes particularly onerous when the beneficiary of this "forcible extraction" is an unknown future person where the incidence of alleged future diseases has been acknowledged by the AAP in the same statement to be insufficient to justify the application of routine circumcision."


http://www.nocirc.org/articles/prescott3.html.


Free Classified Ads
 
HOMENEW LINKSCOOL LINKSNEWSLETTERRANDOM LINKSUBMIT A SITESEARCH

Copyright © 1997-2008 HealthBoard.com